Two to four people, side by side, in your browser.
Compare Work Style Results
Paste results links from people who agreed to share them. The page reads the links in your browser and shows the five averages side by side. Nothing is sent to this site.
For personal reflection and team conversation only. Do not use this to screen, rank, select, promote or discipline anyone.
This link contains your five averages and, if you add one, your label. The page reads them from the link in your browser; this site does not send, receive or store them. Anyone with the link can view and forward it, a link cannot be recalled once shared, and a combined comparison link shows every result in it. If someone adds your result to a comparison, your averages and label become part of that comparison link and travel with it. Share it only with people you choose.
Side by side
Use this page only when every person has agreed to have their result included. Ask before adding or forwarding someone else's result; anyone holding a combined link can see every result in it.
Higher is not better. These numbers are self-reported snapshots, and small gaps may not be meaningful. Do not infer performance, role fit or capability from them.
Use this page only when every person has agreed to have their result included. Ask before adding or forwarding someone else's result; anyone holding a combined link can see every result in it.
Use this page only when every person has agreed to have their result included. Ask before adding or forwarding someone else's result; anyone holding a combined link can see every result in it.
Both ends of every factor
Both descriptions appear for every factor. The averages summarize how you described yourself on these items today, so read them against both descriptions; neither end is a deficit and nothing here is a character judgment.
Extraversion reflection theme: outward engagement (shorthand, not what the scale measures)
Higher tendency
A higher average means that, across these ten items, your responses leaned toward descriptions such as starting conversations, talking with many people and being comfortable at the center of a room. As a reflection prompt, that can show up as quick verbal processing, visible energy in meetings and a readiness to speak first.
Lower tendency
A lower average means that, across these ten items, your responses leaned toward descriptions such as keeping to the background, staying quiet with strangers and having little to say. As a reflection prompt, that can show up as listening before speaking, written over spoken updates and a preference for small groups.
Item content from the IPIP Extraversion markers (Goldberg 1992); the reflection prompts are illustrations, not measured behaviors or predictions.
Agreeableness reflection theme: collaboration stance (shorthand, not what the scale measures)
Higher tendency
A higher average means that, across these ten items, your responses leaned toward descriptions such as sympathizing with others, taking time for people and putting them at ease. As a reflection prompt, that can show up as attention to how decisions land and a pull toward keeping the room together.
Lower tendency
A lower average means that, across these ten items, your responses leaned toward descriptions such as less focus on other people's feelings and problems. As a reflection prompt, that can show up as direct feedback, comfort with unpopular calls and a focus on the task over the mood.
Item content from the IPIP Agreeableness markers (Goldberg 1992); the reflection prompts are illustrations, not measured behaviors or predictions.
Conscientiousness reflection theme: structure and follow-through (shorthand, not what the scale measures)
Higher tendency
A higher average means that, across these ten items, your responses leaned toward descriptions such as being prepared, following a schedule, liking order and attending to detail. As a reflection prompt, that can show up as closed loops, documented process and discomfort with loose ends.
Lower tendency
A lower average means that, across these ten items, your responses leaned toward descriptions such as less emphasis on order, tidiness and routine follow-through. As a reflection prompt, that can show up as improvisation, tolerance for mess and more energy for starting than for finishing.
Item content from the IPIP Conscientiousness markers (Goldberg 1992); the reflection prompts are illustrations, not measured behaviors or predictions.
Emotional Stability reflection theme: steadiness under load (shorthand, not what the scale measures); called Emotional Stability on the IPIP page; much of the research literature scores the same items reversed as Neuroticism
Higher tendency
A higher average means that, across these ten items, your responses leaned toward descriptions such as staying relaxed, seldom feeling low and not worrying much. As a reflection prompt, that can show up as an even keel in a bad quarter and slow escalation.
Lower tendency
A lower average means that, across these ten items, your responses leaned toward descriptions such as feeling stress, worry and upset more readily. As a reflection prompt, that can show up as early sensitivity to risk, fast escalation and visible reactions when plans slip.
Item content from the IPIP Emotional Stability markers (Goldberg 1992); the reflection prompts are illustrations, not measured behaviors or predictions.
Openness reflection theme: appetite for the new (shorthand, not what the scale measures)
Higher tendency
A higher average means that, across these ten items, your responses leaned toward descriptions such as a rich vocabulary, a vivid imagination and comfort with abstract ideas. As a reflection prompt, that can show up as reframing problems, pulling in outside models and restlessness with the standard way.
Lower tendency
A lower average means that, across these ten items, your responses leaned toward descriptions such as less interest in abstract ideas and imagination. As a reflection prompt, that can show up as a preference for the concrete, proven methods over experiments and patience with routine.
Item content from the IPIP Openness markers (Goldberg 1992); the reflection prompts are illustrations, not measured behaviors or predictions.
Averages of ten items on a 1 to 5 scale, approximate rather than precise. The IPIP website does not provide norms and cautions that canned norms may be misleading. This page therefore makes no population comparison and reports only raw keyed averages.
Team conversation guide
This guide is for people who chose to share their results with each other. Everything here is self-description. Both ends of every factor describe real patterns; neither is a deficit, and nothing in it is a performance judgment. Ask about the work first, not about the person.
Extraversion
Higher tendency
A higher average means that, across these ten items, your responses leaned toward descriptions such as starting conversations, talking with many people and being comfortable at the center of a room. As a reflection prompt, that can show up as quick verbal processing, visible energy in meetings and a readiness to speak first.
Lower tendency
A lower average means that, across these ten items, your responses leaned toward descriptions such as keeping to the background, staying quiet with strangers and having little to say. As a reflection prompt, that can show up as listening before speaking, written over spoken updates and a preference for small groups.
- What meeting practices make room for both speaking first and reflecting first?
- When did quick verbal decisions help us this quarter, and when did we need a written round instead?
- How do decisions reach the group from people who prefer to write rather than speak?
Agreeableness
Higher tendency
A higher average means that, across these ten items, your responses leaned toward descriptions such as sympathizing with others, taking time for people and putting them at ease. As a reflection prompt, that can show up as attention to how decisions land and a pull toward keeping the room together.
Lower tendency
A lower average means that, across these ten items, your responses leaned toward descriptions such as less focus on other people's feelings and problems. As a reflection prompt, that can show up as direct feedback, comfort with unpopular calls and a focus on the task over the mood.
- Where do we smooth over a disagreement that the work needed us to argue out?
- Where does direct feedback help the work here, and where does it need more framing?
- What does it cost the team when an unpopular decision has no one willing to hold it in the room?
Conscientiousness
Higher tendency
A higher average means that, across these ten items, your responses leaned toward descriptions such as being prepared, following a schedule, liking order and attending to detail. As a reflection prompt, that can show up as closed loops, documented process and discomfort with loose ends.
Lower tendency
A lower average means that, across these ten items, your responses leaned toward descriptions such as less emphasis on order, tidiness and routine follow-through. As a reflection prompt, that can show up as improvisation, tolerance for mess and more energy for starting than for finishing.
- Which of our processes exist because the work needed them, and which exist only to provide a sense of closure?
- Where does improvisation save us, and where does it leave loose ends for someone else?
- What did we start this year and not finish, and what would have carried it through?
Emotional Stability
Higher tendency
A higher average means that, across these ten items, your responses leaned toward descriptions such as staying relaxed, seldom feeling low and not worrying much. As a reflection prompt, that can show up as an even keel in a bad quarter and slow escalation.
Lower tendency
A lower average means that, across these ten items, your responses leaned toward descriptions such as feeling stress, worry and upset more readily. As a reflection prompt, that can show up as early sensitivity to risk, fast escalation and visible reactions when plans slip.
- When pressure is high, what communication or escalation practice do we rely on, and where does it fail?
- Which early signal of risk did we discount, and how should concerns be raised so they get weighed?
- How do we want pressure handled when a plan slips: who is told, when, and in what form?
Openness
Higher tendency
A higher average means that, across these ten items, your responses leaned toward descriptions such as a rich vocabulary, a vivid imagination and comfort with abstract ideas. As a reflection prompt, that can show up as reframing problems, pulling in outside models and restlessness with the standard way.
Lower tendency
A lower average means that, across these ten items, your responses leaned toward descriptions such as less interest in abstract ideas and imagination. As a reflection prompt, that can show up as a preference for the concrete, proven methods over experiments and patience with routine.
- Where did a new method earn its place, and where did it replace something that worked?
- Which proven routine are we protecting past its useful life?
- How does an outside idea get tested against the floor before it becomes the plan?
The guide does not score anyone, compare anyone with a norm, or support any decision about hiring, promotion, pay or discipline.
The seat notes on the results page describe tendencies in six operator seats and are not part of this guide.
Scope of This Material
Instrument and rights. The fifty statements and the scoring key are the International Personality Item Pool's Big-Five Factor Markers. The pool's permission page states: "Because the IPIP has been placed in the public domain, permission has already been automatically granted for any person to use IPIP items, scales, and inventories for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial." (ipip.ori.org/newPermission.htm, retrieved October 28, 2026). The factor descriptions, seat notes and page design are the work of Kamyar Shah at World Consulting Group.
How this page was built. AI tools were used to draft, test and review the page under the author's direction. The items, the key and the quoted statements were copied from the source pages, which were preserved with their hashes, and a script re-derived the fifty items from those preserved pages and compared them with what this page shows; the record is kept with the project files.
For personal reflection and team conversation only. Do not use this to screen, rank, select, promote or discipline anyone. This is a self-description exercise for personal reflection and team conversation. It is not a validated selection instrument and it does not measure ability. Anyone considering any assessment inside an employment process should get legal counsel on that process first.
General information only. This page provides general information for business owners and operators. It does not provide legal, tax, accounting, medical, psychological, financial, employment, or other professional advice, and it does not account for the facts of any particular person or business. Using it creates no consulting or advisory relationship of any kind. The material is provided as is, without warranty of any kind. World Consulting Group accepts no liability for any action taken or not taken in reliance on it. See the full disclaimer and the privacy page.
The averages summarize how you described yourself today. They say nothing about how your operating cadence, responsibilities and team processes are built. If you want help with those, book a free operations call with World Consulting Group. The call provides no assessment-based role matching and no employment recommendations. The turnover cost calculator is another free tool here.
Book a free operations call